سایت تخصصی حسابداران خبره ایران

ارائه مطالب تخصصی حسابداری و حسابرسی و قوانین

سایت تخصصی حسابداران خبره ایران

ارائه مطالب تخصصی حسابداری و حسابرسی و قوانین

مقاله انگلیسی حسابداری صنعتی و ترجمه آن cost accounting

INDUSTRIAL ACCOUNTING

·      Cost accounting

Cost accounting is the process of tracking, recording and analyzing costs associated with the products or activities of an organization. In modern accounting, costs are measured in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GAAP reporting records historical events and assigns a monetary value to each event that has taken place. Costs are measured in units of currency by convention. Cost accounting could also be defined as a kind of management accounting that translates the Supply Chain (the series of events in the production process that, in concert, result in a product) into financial values. Managers use cost accounting to support decision making to reduce a company's costs and improve its profitability.

There are at least four approaches:

·         Standard Cost Accounting

·         Activity-based Costing

·         Throughput Accounting

·         Marginal Costing

Origins

Cost accounting has long been used to help managers understand the costs of running a business. Modern cost accounting originated during the industrial revolution, when the complexities of running a large scale business led to the development of systems for recording and tracking costs to help business owners and managers make decisions.

In the early industrial age, most of the costs incurred by a business were what modern accountants call "variable costs" because they varied directly with the amount of production. Money was spent on labor, raw materials, power to run a factory, etc. in direct proportion to production. Managers could simply total the variable costs for a product and use this as a rough guide for decision-making.

Some costs tend to remain the same even during busy periods, unlike variable costs which rise and fall with volume of work. Over time, the importance of these "fixed costs" has become more important to managers. Examples of fixed costs include the depreciation of plant and equipment, and the cost of departments such as maintenance, tooling, production control, purchasing, quality control, storage and handling, plant supervision and engineering. In the early twentieth century, these costs were of little importance to most businesses. However, in the twenty-first century, these costs are often more important than the variable cost of a product, and allocating them to a broad range of products can lead to bad decision making. Managers must understand fixed costs in order to make decisions about products and pricing.

For example: A company produced railway coaches and had only one product. To make each coach, the company needed to purchase $60 of raw materials and components, and pay 6 laborers $40 each. Therefore, total variable cost for each coach was $300. Knowing that making a coach required spending $300, managers knew they couldn't sell below that price without losing money on each coach. Any price above $300 became a contribution to the fixed costs of the company. If the fixed costs were, say, $1000 per month for rent, insurance and owner's salary, the company could therefore sell 5 coaches per month for a total of $3000 (priced at $600 each), or 10 coaches for a total of $4500 (priced at $450 each), and make a profit of $500 in both cases.

Standard Cost Accounting

In modern cost accounting, the concept of recording historical costs was taken further, by allocating the company's fixed costs over a given period of time to the items produced during that period, and recording the result as the total cost of production. This allowed the full cost of products that were not sold in the period they were produced to be recorded in inventory using a variety of complex accounting methods, which was consistent with the principles of GAAP. It also enabled managers to effectively ignore the fixed costs, and look at the results of each period in relation to the "standard cost" for any given product.

For example: if the railway coach company normally produced 40 coaches per month, and the fixed costs were still $1000/month, then each coach could be said to incur an overhead of $25 ($1000/40). Adding this to the variable costs of $300 per coach produced a full cost of $325 per coach.

This method tended to slightly distort the resulting unit cost, but in mass-production industries that made one product line, and where the fixed costs were relatively low, the distortion was very minor.

For example: if the railway coach company made 100 coaches one month, then the unit cost would become $310 per coach ($300 + ($1000/100)). If the next month the company made 50 coaches, then the unit cost = $320 per coach ($300 + ($1000/50)), a relatively minor difference.

An important part of standard cost accounting is a variance analysis which breaks down the variation between actual cost and standard costs into various components (volume variation, material cost variation, labor cost variation, etc.) so managers can understand why costs were different than planned and take appropriate action to correct the situation.

Ref.

www.wikipedia.org

Weaknesses of Standard Cost Accounting for Management Decision Making

As time went on, standard cost accounting lost its usefulness for management decision making due to a variety of reasons:

·                     The practice of paying workers on a 'set-piece' basis changed in favour of paying on an hourly rate.

·                     Modern companies tend to have relatively low truly variable costs (primarily raw material, commissions or casual workers) and very high fixed costs (worker salaries, engineering costs, quality control, etc.).

·                     Equipment has become more complex and specialized and may be a very significant proportion of total costs.

·                     Changes in the level of full cost inventory create swings in profitability that are difficult to explain or understand. An increase in inventory can "absorb" costs of production and increase profits, while a decrease in inventory level will decrease profits.

·                     Organizations with a wide range of products or services have processes which are common to several finished items, making cost allocation irrelevant or misleading.

As a result of the above, using standard cost accounting to analyze management decisions can distort the unit cost figures in ways that can lead managers to make decisions that do not reduce costs or maximize profits. For this reason, managers often use the terms "direct costs" and "indirect costs" to replace the standard costing, to better reflect the way allocation of overhead is actually calculated. Indirect costs (often large) are usually allocated in proportion to either labor cost, other direct costs, or some physical resource utilization.

For example: If the railway coach company now paid its workforce a fixed monthly rate of $8,000 (total) and its other fixed costs had risen to $2,600/month, the total fixed costs would then be $10,600/month. The unit cost to make 40 coaches per month would still be $325 per coach ($60 material + ($10,600/40)), but producing 100 coaches would result in a unit cost of $166 per coach ($60 + ($10, 600/100)), provided the company had the capacity to increase production to that level.

Managers using the standard cost for 40 coaches per month would likely reject an order for 100 coaches (to be produced in one month) if the selling price was only $300 per unit, seeing that it would result in a loss of $25 per unit. If they analyzed the fixed vs. variable cost distinction, they would see clearly that filling this order would result in a contribution to fixed costs of $240 per coach ($300 selling price less $60 materials) and would result in a net profit for the month of $13,400 (($240 x 100) - 10,600).

The Development of Throughput Accounting

As companies have become more complex and begun producing a variety of products, the use of cost accounting to make decisions to maximize profitability has come under question. Managers learned in the 1980's about the theory of constraints and began to understand that every production process has a limiting factor somewhere in the chain of production. As managers learned to identify the constraints, they learned to use throughput accounting to manage them and maximize the throughput dollars from each unit of constrained resource.

For example: The railway coach company was offered a contract to make 15 open-topped streetcars each month, using a design which included ornate brass foundry work, but very little of the metalwork needed to produce a covered rail coach. The buyer offered to pay $280 per streetcar. The company had a firm order for 40 rail coaches each month for $350 per unit.

The company accountant determined that the cost of operating the foundry vs. the metalwork shop each month was as follows:

Overhead Cost by Department

Total Cost

Hours Available per month

Cost per hour

Foundry

$ 7,300.00

160

$45.63

Metalshop

$ 3,300.00

160

$20.63

Total

$10,600.00

320

$33.13

The company was at full capacity making 40 rail coaches each month. And since the foundry was expensive to operate, and purchasing brass as a raw material for the streatcars was expensive, the accountant determined that the company would lose money on any streetcars it built. He showed an analysis of the estimated product costs based on standard cost accounting and recommended that the company decline to build any streetcars.

Standard Cost Accounting Analysis

Streetcars

Railcoach

Monthly Demand

15

40

Price

$280

$350

Foundry Time (hrs)

3.0

2.0

Metalwork Time (hrs)

1.5

4.0

Total Time

4.5

6.0

Foundry Cost

$136.88

$ 91.25

Metalwork Cost

$ 30.94

$ 82.50

Raw Material Cost

$120.00

$ 60.00

Total Cost

$287.81

$233.75

Profit per Unit

$ (7.81)

$116.25

However, the company's operations manager knew that recent investment in automated foundry equipment had created idle time for workers in that department. The constraint on production of the railcoaches was the metalwork shop. She made an analysis of profit and loss if the company took the contract using throughput accounting to determine the profitability of products by maximizing "throughput" (revenue less variable cost) in the metal shop.

Throughput Cost Accounting Analysis

Decline Contract

Take Contract

Coaches Produced

40

34

Streetcars Produced

0

15

Foundry Hours

80

113

Metalshop Hours

160

159

Coach Revenue

$14,000

$11,900

Streetcar Revenue

$ 0

$ 4,200

Coach Raw Material Cost

$(2,400)

$(2,040)

Streetcar Raw Material Cost

$ 0

$(1,800)

Throughput Value

$11,600

$12,260

Overhead Expense

$(10,600)

$(10,600)

Profit

$1,000

$1,660

After the presentations from the company accountant and the operations manager, the president understood that the metalshop capacity was limiting the company's profitability. The company could make only 40 railcoaches per month. But by taking the contract for the streetcars, the company could make nearly all the railway coaches ordered, and also meet all the demand for streetcars. The result would increase throughput in the metal shop from $6.25 to $10.38 per hour of available time, and increase profitability by 66 percent. (Spoond 07:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC))

Activity-based costing

Activity-based costing (ABC) is as system for assigning costs to products based on the activities they require. In this case, activities are those regular actions performed inside a company. "Talking with customer regarding invoice questions" is an example of an activity performed inside most companies.

Accountants assign 100% of each employee's time to the different activities performed inside a company (many will use surveys to have the workers themselves assign their time to the different activities). The accountant then can determine the total cost spent on each activity by summing up the percentage of each worker's salary spent on that activity.

Each product or service is produced and delivered via the activities performed in the company. The accountant can then assign the different activities to the different products using an appropriate allocation method.

A company can use the resulting activity cost data to determine where to focus their operational improvement efforts. For example, a job based manufacturer may find that a high percentage of their workers are spending their time trying to figure out a hastily written customer order. Via ABC, the accountants now have a currency amount that will be associated with the activity of "Researching Customer Work Order Specifications". Senior management can now decide how much focus or money to budget for the resolutions of this process deficiency. Activity-based management includes (but is not restricted to) the use of activity-based costing to manage a business.

Marginal Costing

This method is used particularly for short-term decision-making. Its principal tenets are:

  • Revenue (per product) - Variable Costs (per product) = Contribution (per product)
  • Total Contribution - Total Fixed Costs = Total Profit or (Total Loss)

Thus it does not attempt to allocate fixed costs in an arbitrary manner to different products. The short-term objective is to maximize contribution per unit. If constraints exist on resources, then Managerial Accounting dictates that marginal cost analysis be employed to maximize contribution per unit of the constrained resource (see Development of Throughput Accounting, above).

Other costing methods

More varieties of costing methods have been proposed in order to tailor for different aspects of the business. Some of the uprising ones include inventory costing method, process costing method, average costing method, target costing method.

Still, the standard methods and normal costing methods are the most established methods in the world of public accounting. For management accountants in private industry, throughput accounting is rapidly becoming the standard for use in decision making in a fast-paced business environment.

                                                                                        

حسابداری صنعتی

حسابداری هزینه

حسابداری هزینه ، پروسه ردگیری ، ثبت و تجزیه و تحلیل هزینه های اخنصاص یافته به محصولات یا خدمات یک شرکت است.در حسابداری مدرن ،هزینه ها بر اساس اصول پذیرفته شده حسابداری (GAAP) اندازه گیری میشوند. (GAAP) رویدادهای تاریخی را ثبت میکند و یک ارزش پولی را برای آنها در نظر میگیرد. هزینه ها بر مبنای ارز رایج اندازه گیری میشود. حسابداری هزینه را میتوان به صورت نوعی حسابداری مدیریتی که زنجیره منابع (مجموعه ای از رویدادهای مرتبط با تولید محصول) را به مقادیر مالی تبدیل میکند ،تعریف کرد. مدیران از حسابداری هزینه برای پشتیبانی از تصمیم گیری در مورد کاهش هزینه های شرکت و افزایش سوددهی استفاده میکنند.

حداقل چهار روش وجود دارد:

·        حسابداری هزینه یابی استاندارد

·        هزینه یابی بر مبنای فعالیت

·        حسابداری ظرفیت

·        هزینه یابی نهایی

پیدایش:

از حسابداری هزینه برای مدتهای طولانی برای کمک به مدیران در شناخت هزینه های اجرایی یک شرکت استفاده می شده است.حسابداری نوین هزینه در طی سالهای انقلاب صنعتی ایجاد شد ، زمانی که پیچیدگیهای اجرایی یک  شرکت بزرگ باعث توسعه سیستمهای ثبت و ردگیری هزینه ها برای کمک به مالکان شرکت و مدیران در تصمیم گیری شد.

در اوایل عصر صنعتی شدن ،بیشتر هزینه های انجام شده توسط یک شرکت ، از طرف حسابداران جدید "هزینه های متغیر"نامیده میشدند ، زیرا آنها مستقیماً با مقدار تولید تغییر میکردند. پول به کارگران ، مواد اولیه و برق و غیره پرداخت میشد که مستقیماً در تولید نقش داشتند. مدیران به راحتی میتوانستند مجموع هزینه های متغیر را برای یک محصول بدست آورده و از آن بعنوان یک معیار نادرست برای تصمیم گیری استفاده کنند.

بر خلاف هزینه های متغیر که با حجم کار افزایش و کاهش پیدا میکنند، برخی از هزینه ها در طی دوره فعالیت ثابت می مانند. در طی زمان ،اهمیت این "هزینه های ثابت" برای مدیران آشکار شد. نمونه هایی از هزینه های ثابت عبارتند از:

استهلاک تجهیزات و ماشین آلات و هزینه بخشها همانند نگهداری ، ابزارآلات ، کنترل تولید ، خرید ، کنترل کیفی ، انبارداری و حمل ونقل ، سرپرستی و مهندسی سایت .

در اوایل قرن بیستم ،این هزینه ها اهمیت کمی برای اکثر شرکته داشت. با اینحال در قرن بیست و یکم ، این هزینه ها اهمی بیشتری از هزینه های متغیر پیدا کردند ، و اختصاص آنها به رنج وسیعی از محصولات باعث تصمیم گیریهای اشتباه شد. مدیران بایستی برای تصمیم گیری ،هزینه های ثابت را بشناسند.

برای مثال :یک کارخانه واگنهای راه آهن را تولید میکند و همین یک محصول را دارد. برای تولید هر واگن ،شرکت باید $60 مواد اولیه و قطعات خریداری کند  و بابت هر واگن به 6 کارگر نفری $40 پرداخت کند. بنابراین مجموع هزینه هایب متغیر او برای هر واگن $300 است . با دانستن این مطلب که برای هر واگن نیاز به پرداخت $300 است ، اینک مدیران میدانند که در صورت فروش واگن زیر $300 متحمل زیان خواهند شد. هر قیمت بالای $300 ناشی از هزینه های ثابت شرکت است . اگر هزینه های ثابت بابت اجاره ، بیمه و حقوق مالک ،$1000 باشد ، اگر شرکت بتواند در هر ماه 5 واگن با قیمت کلی $3000 (هر واگن $600) ،یا 10 واگن با قیمت کلی $4500 (قیمت هر کدام $450) بفروشد ، آنگاه در هر دو حالت $500 سود خواهد کرد.

حسابداری هزینه یابی استاندارد:

در حسابداری هزینه نوین ، مفهوم ثبت تاریخی هزینه ها ،با اختصاص هزینه های ثابت شرکت در طی یک دوره زمانی خاص و به اقلام تولید شده و ثبت نتایج بعنوان هزینه کلی تولید ،گسترش یافته است.

این مطلب باعث شده است که هزینه محصولاتی که در دوره تولید شده به فروش نرسیده اند را با استفاده از انواع روشهای پیچیده حسابداری که مطابق با اصول (GAAP) هستند ، به صورت موجودی ثبت گردند.

این وضعیت همچنین این امکان را به مدیران میدهد که به طور موثر هزینه های ثابت را نادیده گرفته و به نتایج دوره با توجه به "هزینه یابی استاندارد" برای هر محصول خاص توجه داشته باشند.

برای مثال : اگر شرکت تولید کننده واگن به طور عادی در هر ماه 40 واگن را تولید کند و هزینه های ثابت آن در هر ماه $1000 باشد ،آنگاه میتوان گفت که به هر واگن یک سربار $25 تعلق میگیرد.اضافه کردن این هزینه به هزینه های متغیر $300 برای هر واگن باعث میشود که هزینه کل به $325 برسد.

این روش باعث میشود که در هزینه هر واحد اندکی انحراف ایجاد شود ، اما در صنایع با تولید انبوه که دارای یک خط تولید هستند ، و هزینه های ثابت به نسبت کم است ،این انحراف بسیار ناچیز است.

برای مثال: اگر شرکت تولید کننده واگن در هر ماه 100 واگن را تولید کند ،آنگاه هزینه هر واگن تولید شده $310 (($100/$1000)+$300) خواهد شد. اگر در ماه بعد شرکت 50 واگن را تولید کند ،آنگاه هزینه هر واگن $320 ((50/$1000)+$300) خواهد شد ،که دارای  انحراف کمی است.

یک بخش مهم در حسابداری هزینه یابی استاندارد تحلیلهای واریانس است که انحراف بین هزینه واقعی و هزینه استاندارد را به اجزای مختلف (انحراف حجم ، انحراف هزینه مواد ، انحراف هزینه نیروی کار و غیره)تقسیم میکند به نحوی که مدیران میتوانند بفهمند که چرا هزینه ها نسبت به آنچه برنامه ریزی شده بو ،تغییر کرده است و برای اصلاح آن تصمیم گیری مناسب را انجام دهند.

نظرات 0 + ارسال نظر
برای نمایش آواتار خود در این وبلاگ در سایت Gravatar.com ثبت نام کنید. (راهنما)
ایمیل شما بعد از ثبت نمایش داده نخواهد شد